The current version being debated by UKIP!

“Should the UK Independence Party's MEPs join a European Political Party and a European Political Foundation as defined under Regulation EC 2004/2003?”

Ballot papers due with Independence magazine scheduled for Monday 18-Jul-2011.
Return before Monday 15-Aug-2011
Count 16-Aug-2011

Returning Officer Steve Allison

Party Applications to form PEPPs 30-Sep-2011

CONSIDER AESOP The Lion & The Fox:

The EU was failing and was corrupt. So they pretended to be handing out money, which was just a ruse to make the greedy come to help progress their scam, but the strings attached were binding if hard to see.
The EUroRealists also came to see the offer, but didn't join a PEPP wishing to deal with The EU from outside its political clutches.
The EU asked the EUroRealists why they didn't come in as it was so lavishly rewarded and comfortable living on bribes.
The EUroRealists replied, 'Because we can see the tracks of those going in, but they are destroyed and there are no tracks showing they survived.'

Other people's lives are lessons in how we can avoid danger: it is easy to enter the house of a powerful man, but once you are inside, it may already be too late to get out.

Saturday, 23 April 2011

APRIL - Trevor COLMAN MEP - 'No' to a Pan-European Party

 APRIL - Trevor COLMAN MEP - 'No' to a Pan-European Party

A Step Too Far

By Trevor Colman MEP
The introduction of pan-European parties is a move by the European Union to rid itself of political parties representing national freedom.

The legislation introducing pan-European structures, Regulations (EC) 2004/2003 and 1524/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council 4.11.03 and 18.12.07 clearly identify three requirements alien to UKIP ideals. 

The aim of this legislation, stated again and again, is to hasten the integration process of individual countries into a supra national European state.  The following are just four of the many references to ‘integration’.

The introductory paragraph to Reg. 2004/2003 states ‘political parties at European level are important as a factor for integration’.

Later, Article 2(4) of the same regulation declares that ‘political foundations at European level complement the objectives of the political parties at European level....and on the process of European integration’.

Para 3 of reg. 1524/2007 declares, ‘political foundations at European level affiliated with the political parties at European level may [contribute] to the debate on European public policy issues and on European integration’.
Finally a letter from the Directorate General in April, 2010 stresses that ‘political parties at European level are important as a factor for integration within the Union’.

This legislation makes no attempt to hide the fact that European integration is one of its prime objectives.

Becoming a pan-European party means an acceptance of an EU-twisted society.  Nothing is what it appears to be.

Reg 2004/2003 article 3(c), for example, is a masterful example of EU double-speak.  ‘A political party at European level must observe the principles on which the European Union is founded, namely the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law’. 

UKIP cannot observe the ‘principles on which the EU is founded’.  The EU was falsely presented to the British as a trading arrangement with a promise that ‘there would be no loss of essential national sovereignty’. 

Britain’s EU membership, based entirely on a falsehood, makes it impossible for UKIP to accept the founding of the EU.

Similarly, how can UKIP accept ‘the principles of liberty and democracy’ as defined by EU Treaties when, in reality, no such principles exist in this corrupt, undemocratic structure?

According to Reg. 2004/2003 para 4, ‘respect for human rights’ means,  acceptance of ‘the principles... recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’. 

This Charter (about which the British have never been consulted) destroys our inalienable rights as free-born Britons and tramples on the protections contained in the British Constitution, Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights.     
Para 4 of Reg. 2004/2003 also indicates that the principles, including the ‘rule of law’,  are ‘as set out in the Treaties’. This means a rule of law incorporating Corpus Juris, the European Arrest Warrant, the European Investigation Order, Europol, a European Prosecutor and the European Gendarmerie. Habeas Corpus, jury trial, the safeguards of the British Constitution and the adversarial Anglo Saxon system of criminal justice will vanish.

The so-called ‘founding principles’ in this legislation are a travesty of what they purport to be.
In reality by becoming a pan-European party UKIP would be accepting a structure founded on deceit, with human rights defined and regulated by a secretive political cabal, where democratic processes are denied or ignored and where the rule of law is an oppressive arm of the state.

Funding: Art. 7(1) and (2) Reg. 2004/2003 baldly states that ‘the funding of political parties and foundations at European level from the EU or from any other source, may not be used for the direct or indirect funding of other political parties and in particular national parties or candidates.’

This means EU (public) money can be used to fund pan-European party campaigns but not national parties such as UKIP. 

Further, it is plain from the above that the allegedly large sums of pan-European money cannot be used to benefit UKIP either directly or indirectly.

Despite the massive bribes apparently on offer, EU money, in reality, can only be used supporting a structure that will destroy UKIP.

If UKIP joins or becomes a pan-European party then it will betray Britain and support the federal European state it is sworn to oppose. If that happens, our country is lost.

This is a step too far.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
#08 Middle Street, Chepstow, NP16 5ET, Monmouthshire, United Kingdoms.
tel: 01291 - 62 65 62

No comments:

Post a Comment